Psychometric Testing; it’s not all mumbo jumbo!!
Posted 26th July 2019
As practitioners of Psychometric Testing we witness first-hand varying client opinions surrounding the usefulness of it as a recruitment tool; from those who really value the additional evidence to compound decisions made from straightforward interviews, to the sceptics who look at us like hippies on a gap-year when we ask if they would like to include psychometric testing in the process.
But is it right to simply dismiss these tools as a “load of mumbo jumbo” when recruitment processes are continuously looking for ways to be more robust and more inclusive of diverse groups? As advocates for the enhancement of diversity in the workplace we are always ensuring our selection methods are not simply reliant on the judgement of career history or qualifications (which are very often outdated). Of course, we are not suggesting that psychometrics can replace the value added by an interview (we will always need that human-interaction), but used in conjuction, they can minimise subjective bias and build a much more accurate and detailed picture of each candidate.
What do psychometrics measure?
Psychometrics essentially measure aptitude and personality and can help organisations understand how aspects of an individual’s behavioural style will affect his or her performance at work. They are able to explore culture fit and forecast areas for both development and potential. They allow for situational responses and can be compared to team dynamics already in place within an organisation. At the Executive Level the importance of style complimenting with the existing team is often as important as a candidate’s ability and experience. Any recruitment process should always look inwards as well as outwards to establish what is needed.
Psychometrics allow for more of a rounded look at a candidate’s likely behaviour on a day to day basis and is not subject to interview bias and situational nerves that can so often occur under the pressurised panel interview environment. We have certainly been involved in campaigns whereby good quality, capable candidates have lost out to others simply on the grounds of having less interview experience; but does this really make them less able to carry out the role successfully or to work more effectively with the current team in place?
Delivering a successful interview is a skill in itself and often candidates wear a mask that is fit for purpose. Upon commencing a role they would revert to type as the mask slips. As such, psychometrics can give a good overall picture of a candidate’s personality, motivations, preferred working styles, responses to pressure and culture fit.
Adding value beyond the recruitment process
We always recommend psychometric testing ahead of a final stage selection process. This allows for interviews to be further tailored and specific areas to be investigated; enhancing the chance of a hire being made first time round that lasts! They can also allow for candidates with potential to be identified through areas of training where perhaps the “perfect” candidate has not come forward or does not exist.
Embedding psychometrics into an existing campaign without the need for additional time can lead to a much more robust process that will reduce risk of failure and ultimately lead to the right appointment being made first time. If used over time as part of recruitment succession planning, we can also look to previous campaigns to see what traits were present in those successful hires to allow for replication.
And the value is also clear for candidates; 99% of those we surveyed after completing psychometric tests really recognised themselves in the result and saw it as a useful tool to help with preparation for interview in recognising areas of skill and development.
If you would like to talk to us further about how we can support your senior level recruitment with psychometric testing please contact us on firstname.lastname@example.org
Written by Sarah Walker, Operations Manager, July 2019. Sarah is one of our in-house psychometric profilers. She has been qualified in BPS Level A and B: Occupational Ability and Occupational Personality for a number of years now and has helped many interview panels make clear and confident decisions through her expert guidance.
Posted by Sarah Walker
Share this article.
Following a truly international search, Dixon Walter are absolutely delighted to have played a part in attracting somebody of the calibre of Nic Palmarini from the MIT-IBM Watson AI Lab at MIT to this key national role, hosted at Newcastle University.
The new academic year is well underway and we’ve taken a look at those who have started the year with a new position…
Every month we are offering a round-up of the month’s appointments, hires and promotions. Keep track of the developments in the sector with our latest movers and shakers column.